- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:48:54 -0500
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Jacek Kopecky wrote: [snip] >> Appendix A: the owl ontology source: >> I notice that a lot of properties have rdfs:range defined, but not >> rdfs:domain. I assume this is because these properties could be >> applied >> to more than one class. Would it make sense to create some >> superclasses >> for these, so that the rdfs:domains can be specified? > > Yes, some of the properties can be applied to multiple classes. I > choose > not to introduce superclasses for such things. Make the domain the disjunction of the two classes. That expresses exactly what you intended. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:49:05 UTC