On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Jacek Kopecky wrote: [snip] >> Appendix A: the owl ontology source: >> I notice that a lot of properties have rdfs:range defined, but not >> rdfs:domain. I assume this is because these properties could be >> applied >> to more than one class. Would it make sense to create some >> superclasses >> for these, so that the rdfs:domains can be specified? > > Yes, some of the properties can be applied to multiple classes. I > choose > not to introduce superclasses for such things. Make the domain the disjunction of the two classes. That expresses exactly what you intended. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:49:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C0.50 : Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:49:05 GMT