W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:48:54 -0500
Message-Id: <55521b154df3de305c3b6fee90c21b8c@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>

On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
>> Appendix A: the owl ontology source:
>> I notice that a lot of properties have rdfs:range defined, but not
>> rdfs:domain.  I assume this is because these properties could be 
>> applied
>> to more than one class.  Would it make sense to create some 
>> superclasses
>> for these, so that the rdfs:domains can be specified?
> Yes, some of the properties can be applied to multiple classes. I 
> choose
> not to introduce superclasses for such things.

Make the domain the disjunction of the two classes. That expresses 
exactly what you intended.

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:49:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:58 UTC