W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2006

ACTION: Arthur to look at CR098

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:20:59 -0500
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5DBCF188.CB4105BC-ON85257244.00105AAA-85257244.00126D1F@ca.ibm.com>
In fulfillment of my action item [1] I gave looked at CR098 [2] which 
recommend that we not treat the following statement as an assertion [3]:

Specifically components that the schema imports via xs:import are NOT 
referenceable.? 

This statement is weaker than the assertion [4]

When resolving QNames references for schema definitions, the namespace 
MUST be imported by the referring WSDL 2.0 document. 


I agree that we should leave the sentence but remove the assertion markup. 
However, I also recommend that we correct the wording. A document imports 
namespaces, not components. I recommend the following wording which also 
spells things more explicitly:

Note that components in the namespace that the inline schema imports via 
xs:import are not automatically referenceable from the WSDL 2.0 document 
that contains the inline schema.


[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Dec/att-0032/20061207-ws-desc-minutes.html#action02
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR098
[3] 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Types-1300002
[4] 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Types-1300001

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 03:21:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:43 GMT