- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:57:06 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0012.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Prasad Yendluri, Youenn Fablet, Kevin Liu, Umit Yalcinalp,
Paul Downey, Dale Moberg, Jean-Jacques Moreau,
Tony Rogers, Rebecca Bergersen, Hugo Haas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Mar 3-4 FTF [.1, .2] and summary (.3)
- Mar 10 telcon [.4]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0021/20050303-ws-desc-minutes.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0021/20050304-ws-desc-minutes.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0021.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0037/20050310-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1]. Editorial actions [.2].
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-09-02: Bijan to create stylesheet to generate a
table of components and properties.
HOLD 2004-09-16: Editors to move App C to RDF Mapping spec,
except the frag-id which will move
within media-type reg appendix.
? 2004-09-16: Editors to fix paragraph 6-9 of section
2.1.1 moved into 2.1.2
which talks about the syntax.
? 2004-10-14: Editors to add a statement like:
The Style property may constrain both
input and output, however a particular
style may constrain in only one
direction. In Section 2.4.1.1 of Part 1.
? 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith
proposal using an extension namespace.
(LC54)
? 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing
the compromise proposal on formal objections.
? 2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists
? 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal
and email it to the list as a response
to the objection.
? 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the
test suite for the purpose of
interoperability testing.
? 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specific text
for the editors (LC18).
? 2005-01-06: Umit? to respond to Larry, "not dynamic,
other solutions equally bad, not
recommendation track, if problems
happy to consider those"
? 2005-01-13: Part 1 Editors to incorporate the text
at 2004Dec/0022.html.
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to call out the difference
between WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 in respect to
single interface per service, and
indicate alternatives
? 2005-01-19: Part 1 Editors to rewrite ONMR as Best
practice.
? 2005-02-03: Part 1 editors to incorporate text from
Jan/0026 and Feb/0006.
? 2005-02-17: Jacekk to help Bijan advance the RDF mapping work
DONE 2005-03-03: Jonathan will ask the WG what is the publication
plan for the type system note around 3/17.
? 2005-03-03: Asir to double check the subissues of 76d to
see if they should be raised as issues and to
do so.
? 2005-03-04: Editors to merge parts 2 and 3, move the rpc
style from part 1 into it and name the result
"Adjuncts".
DONE [.6] 2005-03-04: Roberto to come up with a proposal for LC75g
(wildcards in rpc style)
? 2005-03-10: Anish and Umit will respond to comments on
media type description documents with our
actions.
? 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C
to RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still
relavant
? 2005-03-10: Editors (Arthur?) to hide the Z from the
normative version.
? 2005-03-10: Editors to check URI and schema references in
Part 1
DONE [.3, .4] 2005-03-10: Jonathan to notify the XMLP, i18n and XML
Schema groups that we are prepared to
publish.
? 2005-03-10: Marsh to troll minutes looking for more CR
criteria.
DONE [.5] 2005-03-10: Part1 editors to replace import/include table
w/ that from Asir
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/actions.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0010.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0011.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0011.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0038.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF dates:
- April 21-22, Mountain View (Microsoft)
Registration [.1] Logistics [.2]
- May 30 - June 1 Berlin
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/wsdwgf2f0504/
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Primer [.1]
- DBooth and Kevin solicit help for Advanced Topics section [.2]
- Volunteers for the following sections:
+ Section 7.2 Features and Properties (Glen)
+ Section 7.3 Import mechanism and authoring style (Arthur)
+ Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the
Same Service (David)
+ Section 7.5 Versioning and Service Equivalency (Paul)
+ Section 7.8 Operation Style and RPC (Umit)
+ Section 7.11 Service References (Arthur)
+ Section 7.12 XML Schema Examples (Paul)
+ Section 7.13 Multiple In-Line Schemas (Arthur)
+ Section 7.14 The schemaLocation Attribute (Arthur)
+ Section 7.15 Mapping to RDF and Semantic Web (Bijan Jacek)
- Sections marked as "at risk" if no volunteer can be found:
+ Section 7.7 Security Considerations
- March 30 deadline!
[.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0004.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Media Type Description issues [.1]
- WG review in progress?
- Try to have comments in by 21 March.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0003.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Last Call Issues [.1]. Comments list [.2]
- none
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Component model changes
- LC105: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model [.2]
- Arthur's modification to the LC105 proposal [.3]
- Need to decide whether to allow "property" extensions at the
top level.
- Resolutions so far:
+ Add constraint that top-level components must be unique.
+ Add parent property to nested components.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/0060.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/0056.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/0066.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC75u: Add wsdl:documentation to the component model [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75u
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue LC83: The Component Model Does Not Enforce Component
Nesting [.1]
- Parent property
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC83
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue
- Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
extension
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC54
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue LC84b: [.1]
- Hugo's draft proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC84b
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Feb/0035.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue LC74: Idle question [.1]
- Can WSDL 2.0 import WSDL 1.0?
- Note that the resolution to LC5e [.2] defines WSDL Document as
WSDL 2.0 namespace.
- Options:
a) No. Spec (with LC5e resolution) is clear enough.
b) No. Specifically note that i*ing 1.1 docs is not supported.
c) Yes. Change spec to define that this is possible, though
how to turn a WSDL 1.1 doc into WSDL 2.0 components is not
defined.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC5e
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue LC75w: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments (w) [.1]
- Relax requirement that include href must be dereferencable.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC75w
------------------------------------------------------------------
19. Other issues if time allows (ha!)
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:57:19 UTC