W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2005

Re: LC84b: Proposal for generic action property

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:24:29 +0100
To: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050217112429.GC2676@w3.org>
* Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> [2005-02-11 01:00-0500]
[..]
> Hugo, do we need to update the SOAP over HTTP binding to specify that the
> SOAPAction header gets set to the {action} property of the input message?

Yes, we would.

> Do we need to specify where the {action} property of an output message goes
> in the response?  Does it go nowhere?

For SOAP 1.2, I think that it can be expressed on the output message
too.

SOAP 1.1 defines SOAPAction only for the request AFAICT[1], so it
wouldn't be expressed in this case.

Cheers,

Hugo

  1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383528
-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:24:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT