- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:15:59 +0200
- To: "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: tomj@macromedia.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
>-----Original Message----- >From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh >Sent: Tuesday, Oct 19, 2004 10:28 AM >To: Amelia A Lewis; Sanjiva Weerawarana >Cc: tomj@macromedia.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org >Subject: RE: is operation/@pattern optional? > > > >FWIW, my recollection matches Amy's that we agreed to leave @pattern a >required attribute. But don't let that stop you from searching the >archives! > I am glad that you remember it like that as well. I have the same recollection that Amy has. I was afraid it was going to be a boys-vs-girls thing. ;-) Cheers, --umit >> -----Original Message----- >> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] >On >> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis >> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:08 AM >> To: Sanjiva Weerawarana >> Cc: tomj@macromedia.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org >> Subject: Re: is operation/@pattern optional? >> >> >> Hmmm. >> >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:58:53 +0600 >> Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote: >> > I make it a point to remember my side of the story ;-) .. so >> > are we now at a "he said, she said" case??? If so 2-1, that's >> > a *clear* victory I'd say! No hanging chads even. >> >> No, we're now at a "my recollection of our decisions doesn't >match the >> specification," which is where we started. I think that, all things >> considered, it is up to you (or to Tom, if he feels strongly, or >someone >> else who feels strongly in favor of making this change to the current >> specification as published) to find a record, in the minutes, showing >> that this [adjectives suppressed] decision was taken. >> >> I don't think you can, mind, because I distinctly recall that it was >> voted down. I believe that this was going on about the time of the >New >> York face to face, possibly earlier. But I'm sure that, if you want >to >> modify the specification, you'll either find minutes to justify it as >> editorial, or you'll raise it as an issue. >> >> :-) >> >> Amy! >> -- >> Amelia A. Lewis >> Senior Architect >> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. >> alewis@tibco.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 19:16:35 UTC