W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

RE: is operation/@pattern optional?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:27:28 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5055846F5@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <tomj@macromedia.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

FWIW, my recollection matches Amy's that we agreed to leave @pattern a
required attribute.  But don't let that stop you from searching the

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:08 AM
> To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Cc: tomj@macromedia.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: is operation/@pattern optional?
> Hmmm.
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:58:53 +0600
> Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I make it a point to remember my side of the story ;-) .. so
> > are we now at a "he said, she said" case??? If so 2-1, that's
> > a *clear* victory I'd say! No hanging chads even.
> No, we're now at a "my recollection of our decisions doesn't match the
> specification," which is where we started.  I think that, all things
> considered, it is up to you (or to Tom, if he feels strongly, or
> else who feels strongly in favor of making this change to the current
> specification as published) to find a record, in the minutes, showing
> that this [adjectives suppressed] decision was taken.
> I don't think you can, mind, because I distinctly recall that it was
> voted down.  I believe that this was going on about the time of the
> York face to face, possibly earlier.  But I'm sure that, if you want
> modify the specification, you'll either find minutes to justify it as
> editorial, or you'll raise it as an issue.
> :-)
> Amy!
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 17:27:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT