W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2004

RE: is operation/@pattern optional?

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:09:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB0A925A18@pop-newton.allaire.com>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


You don't have to use the pattern if you have a single input or a single
input and output message is how I remember things.


--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Amelia A Lewis
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 12:45 PM
> To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: is operation/@pattern optional?
> 
> 
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:27:34 +0600
> Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> > For some reason I recall that we made operation/@pattern optional
> > (using the heuristics I had proposed for how to compute it for
> > certain patterns). However the spec says its required!
> >
> > Am I hallucinating?
> 
> Yup.
> 
> There was strong opposition to using those heuristics.  I just wrote a
> couple of paragraphs reiterating those arguments, but I guess I'll spare
> you that, on mature reflection.  :-)
> 
> We made the labels of messages optional.  The pattern URI is required,
> in all cases.  Order of input and output elements in the operation
> element is not significant.
> 
> Amy!
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 18:09:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:33 GMT