W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

RE: proposal: make binding/operation/(input|output)/@messageLabel optional

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:00:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB06FDDFD1@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


+1 to making the messageLabel attribute optional on the binding operations.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 5:49 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: proposal: make binding/operation/(input|output)/@messageLabel
optional


I know we discussed this before but the way things are is not
consistent. If there's exactly one input or output message in a
MEP there's no need to have the @messageLabel in binding either.

Can we please re-consider this? Look at the syntax summary
section and you'll see what I mean:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#Syntax-S
ummary

I'd like to make the attribute optional and keep the same rules
as with interface/operation/(input|output)/@messageLabel.

Thanks,

Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 10:00:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT