W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

RE: Issue 32: Will SOAP 1.1 still be supported?

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:51:35 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF0FFF2083@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

This forms the basis of a concern we have with the WS-I process: what is the road-map for migrating from Basic Profile 1.0 services towards those using SOAP 1.2 and WSDL 2.0 ?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
Sent: 17 March 2004 09:16
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS Description List
Subject: Re: Issue 32: Will SOAP 1.1 still be supported?



No disagreement with having the binding. My point is simply about where 
the binding actually appears, i.e. directly in Part 3 or in a companion 
Note.

JJ.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> I'd say there is a strong reason .. people will actually use WSDL2
> much faster if we have a SOAP 1.1 binding :-).
> 
> I don't think its a lot of work .. do you?
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
> Cc: "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Issue 32: Will SOAP 1.1 still be supported?
> 
> 
> 
>>Is there any strong reason for including this binding in Part3? Could it 
>>be published as a Note instead?
>>
>>JJ.
>>
>>Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Per our new charter the answer is yes.  I recommend we close this issue
>>>as obsolete, and solicit a volunteer for an action item to draft a soap
>>>1.1 binding for us to discuss.
>>>
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 05:52:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT