W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Rough text per resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/ include fails)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 00:13:50 +0600
Message-ID: <028001c40539$235def90$c8d418ac@watson.ibm.com>
To: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Committed into editor's draft.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:43 PM
Subject: RE: Rough text per resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/
include fails)


>
>
> +1
>
> This sounds good to me.  I like text that makes implementations of WSDL
> tools behave in a consistent manner.
>
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of David Booth
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:30 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Rough text per resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if
import/include
> fails)
>
>
> Per today's resolution of issue 127 (Behavior if import/include fails),
> here is some rough wording for WSDL Processor conformance section:
>
> [[
> A conformant WSDL processor MUST fail if it processes an element
containing
> a wsdl:include statement having a URI that is not dereferenced to a legal
> WSDL document.
> ]]
>
> This needs to be refined a little more into spec-ese, but I think it
> captures the intent of today's decision.
>
>
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 13:15:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT