W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

RE: WSDL Import/Include Locations

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 05:04:21 -0800
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B6338015FE092@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I could go either way. I'm certainly happy with what you state below.
 
Gudge


________________________________

	From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
	Sent: 04 March 2004 12:41
	To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
	Subject: Re: WSDL Import/Include Locations
	
	

	Gudge, 
	
	My understanding is that it is OK to pull in the same definition
twice. It is an error to pull in two definitions of the same component
if the definitions differ. Do you agree? 
	
	Arthur Ryman,
	Rational Desktop Tools Development
	
	phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
	assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
	fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
	mobile: +1-416-969-5063
	intranet: http://w3.torolab.ibm.com/DEAB/ 
	
	www-ws-desc-request@w3.org wrote on 03/01/2004 06:02:17 PM:
	
	> 
	> Which means that if one did decide to use two imports to pull
in the 
	> same data for the purpose of robustness then if both imports
succeed, 
	> besides wasting time and resources, the WSDL would be illegal
since the 
	> same data would be pulled in twice.
	> 
	
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 08:05:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT