W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:00:32 +0200
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040628120032.GA24146@w3.org>
* Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> [2004-06-25 23:29+0600]
> I've updated the draft per the telecon decision yesterday to put
> F&P in a few more places. Please review.
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html
> I note (with disgust) that we're severly discriminating against
> Interface Fault components and Binding Fault components by not 
> allowing them to contain F&P (properties). Poor suckers.

I actually don't understand why this is either. Could somebody explain
the issue around having F&P on fault components?



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 08:02:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT