W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:46:55 +0600
Message-ID: <079a01c45995$84657fa0$9f484109@LANKABOOK>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

That's right - we removed {web method} because that knob doesn't
exist. IIRC we closed this issue in that process but if not it
certainly should be.

The rules for HTTP method selection are now documented in the
default binding rules section (2.1) of part3:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-bindings.html#soap-defaults

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
To: "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 3:12 AM
Subject: Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute?


>
> Issue 169 [1] asks whether the webMethod property should be indicted
> using property markup or an attribute.  It's been a while since we
> raised this issue, and as I recall we removed the {web method} property
> and syntax already [2], because when http:method is specified webMethod
> is not a controllable knob in the binding - it is a fixed value.  So is
> this issue obsolete or is there a nuance I'm missing?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x169
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0073.html
> (issue 190 discussion and resolution)
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 22:47:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT