W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Which operation?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:06:02 -0700
Message-Id: <47A03728-BEEE-11D8-8A84-000A95BD86C0@mnot.net>
Cc: <distobj@acm.org>, <dorchard@bea.com>, <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>

On Jun 15, 2004, at 3:46 AM, <paul.downey@bt.com> wrote:
> AIUI in the above example either:
>   1) some mechanism beyond the GED* is being used to dispatch
>      an incoming schema1 to the individual operations
>   2) there is no mechanism - this WSDL is ambiguous.
> In the case of (1) it should be possible to describe the mechanism
> being used in a WSDL document, e.g.:
>    - a binding specific mechanism is being used, in which case a
>      binding specific description should be in place.
>    - it could be a generic addressing header mechanism, in which case
>      we have extensions or F&Ps
>    - or it could be a mechanism describable in the interface, e.g.
>      another element or attribute uniquely identifies the operation.
>      Maybe this is the case a generic mechanism akin to XOP's use
>      of XQDM[1].
>    - finally it could be something completely out of band - my username
>      denotes i'm a Gold Paying Customer, or first 100 messages each day
>      are Gold, the remainder will be "bog-standard". I'm not sure what
>      we could do here in the WSDL language beyond kick it out to an
>      extension mechanism - this kind of interaction is outside of the
>      domain of WSDL and in that scary land of "policy".
> So WSDL could describe the dispatching mechanism being used via binding
> specific mechanisms or extensions and i don't think we should do 
> anything
> to prevent other to attempt to recognise (2) at the cost of not being 
> able
> to describe all of (1) as well as other unforeseen dispatching 
> mechanisms.

Yup; well said. I was only pointing out the common case of using URI 
components (e.g., path segments, query arguments) to do the dispatch, 
and therefore the desirability of describing them using bindings.


Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 13:06:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:48 UTC