- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 06:13:15 +0600
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> writes: > > Shouldn't #3 be a SOAP request? That would be more HTTP friendly. > You'd either need an HTTP extension equivalent to SMTP TURN/ETRN to > "turn the connection around", or create a tunnel via CONNECT, in order > to make this a visible interaction to HTTP intermediaries. > > Mark. It could be, but then the whole pattern would not be a use of the WSDL request/response MEP bound to the SOAP request/response MEP being carried over an asynch protocol. One can of course do a similar thing with two one-way operations, but its not the same thing. Sanjiva.
Received on Saturday, 31 January 2004 19:12:08 UTC