On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:45:56AM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I understood what DaveO wanted as: > > 1. node A makes an HTTP POST to node B with a SOAP Request and > information on where to POST the HTTP response to > 2. node B responds with something like 201 OK > 3. later on, node B makes an HTTP POST to node A with a SOAP Response > 4. node A responds with something like 201 OK Shouldn't #3 be a SOAP request? That would be more HTTP friendly. You'd either need an HTTP extension equivalent to SMTP TURN/ETRN to "turn the connection around", or create a tunnel via CONNECT, in order to make this a visible interaction to HTTP intermediaries. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Saturday, 31 January 2004 14:50:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:41 GMT