W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:13:54 -0800
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B63380107D2C8@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "Web Services Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

PAOS is slightly different. It has two MEPs, the one I think you are
thinking of works as follows:

Given nodes A and B:

1.	node A makes an HTTP GET to node B.
2.	Node B sends a SOAP Request as the HTTP response.
3.	Node A responds with a SOAP response in an HTTP POST to Node B. 
4.	Node B responds with some HTTP response ( typically a web page )

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret
> Sent: 26 January 2004 15:29
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: Web Services Description
> Subject: Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed
> 
> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:49, David Orchard wrote:
> > We'd like to see an Asynch HTTP binding for In-Out. This 
> uses two HTTP 
> > connections, one for each direction.  We have found this "asynch"
> > request/response over HTTP to be a very common pattern in 
> customer use 
> > and would like an explicit HTTP binding.
> 
> So, I explicitly excluded all out-something from the HTTP 
> binding because I'm still not convinced on how the WSDL 
> processor can be handled this without extra information. 
> Addressing would be at least required and I don't know if we 
> want to have addressing required in all WSDL processors. 
> Unless we have addressing, we cannot describe asynch HTTP 
> imho. Also, since the "out" or "asynch-out" message are 
> really HTTP "in"
> message, I believe that the those message would need extra 
> handling in the binding spec.
> 
> Is this related to PAOS btw?
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 11:15:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:28 GMT