W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Asynch request/response HTTP binding needed

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:29:28 -0500
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1075148967.24894.100.camel@jfouffa.w3.org>
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:49, David Orchard wrote:
> We'd like to see an Asynch HTTP binding for In-Out. This uses two HTTP
> connections, one for each direction.  We have found this "asynch"
> request/response over HTTP to be a very common pattern in customer use and
> would like an explicit HTTP binding.

So, I explicitly excluded all out-something from the HTTP binding
because I'm still not convinced on how the WSDL processor can be handled
this without extra information. Addressing would be at least required
and I don't know if we want to have addressing required in all WSDL
processors. Unless we have addressing, we cannot describe asynch HTTP
imho. Also, since the "out" or "asynch-out" message are really HTTP "in"
message, I believe that the those message would need extra handling in
the binding spec.

Is this related to PAOS btw?


Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:32:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:46 UTC