On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:49, David Orchard wrote: > We'd like to see an Asynch HTTP binding for In-Out. This uses two HTTP > connections, one for each direction. We have found this "asynch" > request/response over HTTP to be a very common pattern in customer use and > would like an explicit HTTP binding. So, I explicitly excluded all out-something from the HTTP binding because I'm still not convinced on how the WSDL processor can be handled this without extra information. Addressing would be at least required and I don't know if we want to have addressing required in all WSDL processors. Unless we have addressing, we cannot describe asynch HTTP imho. Also, since the "out" or "asynch-out" message are really HTTP "in" message, I believe that the those message would need extra handling in the binding spec. Is this related to PAOS btw? PhilippeReceived on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:32:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:41 GMT