If you want it, write it up and propose it to the group for inclusion. If you can convince enough folks, it'll likely go in. out-optional-in is there because I made a nuisance of myself. Amy! On Jan 26, 2004, at 3:00 PM, David Orchard wrote: > > There is an out-optional-in but what about in-optional-out? > > Cheers, > Dave >Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 15:17:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:41 GMT