RE: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec from Jeffrey Schlimmer on 2003-09-21 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2003)

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 21:33:45 -0700
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB802F26837@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.mi>

> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> 
> That's a good question too - but I wouldn't want to (and am not
> trying to) cut down the number of patterns via this direction. I
> was just saying that if we want to provide simplified syntax
> for the recognized patterns then its harder to split that kind of
> fundamental stuff across two documents.

Have we agreed that we need different syntax within the
interface/operation for the different values of the pattern URI?

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 00:32:59 UTC