Re: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec

"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> Have we agreed that we need different syntax within the
> interface/operation for the different values of the pattern URI?

I don't think we explicitly said that we want to do it .. I'm
advocating that we do for the In-only, In-Out (and reverse;
depending on what patterns we choose to define). 

Sanjiva.

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 14:13:35 UTC