- From: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:15:58 -0700
- To: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > > > Roberto Chinnici wrote: > >> Umit Yalcinalp wrote: >> >>> >>> Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc >>> encoding rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. >>> For an outsider who reads the current document, there is no >>> indication such that there is (going to be) an established URI that >>> indicates RPC style encoding rules, and the set of rules that the >>> operation (aka messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided >>> to add the rules and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also >>> decided that the (missing) rules, if the value is present, were >>> normative. >>> >>> Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet? >> >> >> >> The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the >> last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that >> what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd >> finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial >> note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC >> encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound? >> >> Roberto > > > > Thanks for the clarification. An editorial note will definitely help. Done. It's at the top of section 2.3.2.3 of part 1. Roberto
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 14:14:42 UTC