W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2003

RE: On WSDL "operation"

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:26:19 -0600
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E4068C2388@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Savas Parastatidis [mailto:Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: WS Description List
> Subject: RE: On WSDL "operation"

> > 
> > So I'll stand by "messageExchange."
> 
> I agree with Jim on this one.

I certainly don't want to make an issue of it.  I strongly agree with the
sentiment that WSDL should distance itself from shared-object-invocation
implications.  Jim's point that WSDL per se just talks about the format of
the message and not about what what it does is well taken.  Still, there's a
danger in being too abstracted away from the notion that WSDL is about
"services" and not arbitrary messages.  But I'll shut up now and let you
sort out the terminology! 
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 11:26:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:26 GMT