W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2003

Issues with XML schema

From: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 15:02:33 -0700
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <3EB98279.2030601@sun.com>

I had an action item to explain some of the issues with XML Schema that could 
lead to subsetting it in the Web services space.

The basic problem I see is that SOAP is an enveloping technology for blocks 
which are meant to be processed independently. But XML Schema (and XML itself, 
e.g. with ID/IDREF) allows one to specify constraints whose validation rules 
are applied across the whole document.

So, for instance, an application that generates a XML fragment that will 
become a block in a SOAP envelope must take same care when specifying the 
value for an attribute of type xsd:ID, as a poor choice would result in an 
invalid *envelope*. Notice that if the fragment was considered in isolation, 
i.e. as a mini-document, it would be valid. Where it gets tricky is that, in 
order to make sure that the resulting document is valid, the application must 
have full knowledge of the schemas for *all* the blocks (because any attribute 
  could be an ID).

The converse, a fragment that is invalid in isolation but becomes valid in the 
context of a larger document, can be readily demonstrated using an attribute 
of type xsd:IDREF whose value doesn't match any IDs in the fragment.

Initially I thought the same problem would apply to identity constraints in 
schema, but now that I found out that the XPath expressions in the 
<xsd:selector/> element must use the "child" axis I don't think that's the 
case. In other words, these constraints always operate within a fragment.

Hopefully some of the schema gurus on this list will jump in and confirm or 
reject my conclusions...  ;-)

Roberto

-- 
Roberto Chinnici
Web Technologies and Standards
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
roberto.chinnici@sun.com
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 18:39:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:24 GMT