- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:23:20 +0100
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Gudge, Overall, sounds good! Some (minor) comments below. * "Message references may be to messages this operation accepts, that is input messages, or messages this operation sends, that is output messages." The sentence is hard to parse. What about instead: "Message references are references to either: messages accepted by this operation (input messages); or messages sent by this operation (output messages)." * Are you not working off an old copy of Part 1? I thought I had replaced "variety" by "message exchange pattern" just after the last f2f, as per the WG's resolution, and change seems to have disappeared? Jean-Jacquqes. Gudge wrote: > We agreed at the Scottsdale FTF to incorporate MEPs into our design. > Amy, Jeff and I have done some work on this. Proposed changes to part 1 > are detailed in[1,2] using diff markup. Proposed definitions for the 7 > MEPs we decided to define are at[3,4]. > > Comments, suggestions, flames etc. to the usual address. > > Gudge > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1 > .46.2.3&content-type=text/xml > [2] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev= > 1.21.2.1&content-type=text/html > [3] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-meps.xml? > rev=1.6&content-type=text/xml > [4] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-meps.html > ?rev=1.1&content-type=text/html >
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 12:24:29 UTC