W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2003

Re: MEP proposal

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:23:20 +0100
Message-ID: <3E550F08.3040004@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org, Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>

Gudge,

Overall, sounds good! Some (minor) comments below.

* "Message references may be to messages this operation accepts, 
that is input messages, or messages this operation sends, that is 
output messages."

The sentence is hard to parse. What about instead: "Message 
references are references to either: messages accepted by this 
operation (input messages); or messages sent by this operation 
(output messages)."

* Are you not working off an old copy of Part 1? I thought I had 
replaced "variety" by "message exchange pattern" just after the 
last f2f, as per the WG's resolution, and change seems to have 
disappeared?

Jean-Jacquqes.

Gudge wrote:
> We agreed at the Scottsdale FTF to incorporate MEPs into our design.
> Amy, Jeff and I have done some work on this. Proposed changes to part 1
> are detailed in[1,2] using diff markup. Proposed definitions for the 7
> MEPs we decided to define are at[3,4].
> 
> Comments, suggestions, flames etc. to the usual address.
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
> .46.2.3&content-type=text/xml
> [2]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
> 1.21.2.1&content-type=text/html
> [3]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-meps.xml?
> rev=1.6&content-type=text/xml
> [4]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-meps.html
> ?rev=1.1&content-type=text/html
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 12:24:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT