W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Fuflillment of action item: language for circular includes

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:08:40 -0500
To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Cc: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-id: <6E8A7304-2C0D-11D8-A8A8-0050E416A465@tibco.com>

Good.  +1 to all suggestions here.
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 10:52  AM, David Booth wrote:

> Hi Amy,
>
> Your proposed text looks reasonable.  I have a few editorial 
> suggestions though:
>
> At 01:01 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
>> . . .
>> Proposed text:
>>
>> Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document MUST be resolved to a
>
> Change: "MUST be resolved" to "resolves".
>
>> single set of components.  Mutual, multiple, and circular includes are
>> explicitly permitted, and do not represent multiple redefinitions of 
>> the
>> same components.
>
> Insert: "Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document has the same 
> meaning as including it only once."
>
>> Processors are encouraged to keep track of the source
>> of component definitions, so that multiple, mutual, and circular
>> includes do not require establishing identity component-by-component.
>
> It might be good to move the following to the beginning of the 
> paragraph, to avoid the forward reference:
>
>> A
>> mutual include is direct inclusion by one WSDL document of another 
>> WSDL
>> document which includes the first.  A circular include achieves the 
>> same
>> effect with greater indirection (WSDL A includes WSDL B includes WSDL 
>> A,
>> for instance).
>
> -- 
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 14:04:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT