- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:12:12 -0500
- To: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I made a misstep in naming one of the added patterns, using the term "asynch" because I couldn't, at the time, think of a better distinguisher. A name that better fits the pattern used throughout part two would be: "output-optional-input". That is, output followed by (optional) input. This helps distinguish it from the output-input pattern (where input is required), but does not give the (misleading) impression that it can only be used in an asynchronous environment (although it *is* true that using output-optional-input in a synchronous environment is a bear with cubs). Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 14:12:11 UTC