- From: Mike Deem <mikedeem@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:13:59 -0700
- To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
See [1] for an example of how this can be done. == Mike == [1] http://indigo-sd/docs/bluebook/encapsulation/WSDL-Extension-for-DIME.doc _generated.htm#wsdl-extension-for-dime__toc7968299 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:01 PM > To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: issue: optional parts in <message>? > > "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> > > > > It would be nice if common interoperable representational types were > > described in a way that could be leveraged across all the XML > > activities, even those that do not use WSDL. Of course, if there wasn't > > a way to define "foreign" types in XML Schema, working groups like ours > > would be forced to come with their own "first class" definitions, but > > that doesn't seem to be the case any longer. > > I am not a schema expert- could you please show the syntax for how > I would define a MIME type using XSD? See how it can be done easily > will help alleviate this aspect of my concerns at least! > > Thanks, > > Sanjiva. >
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 21:14:31 UTC