W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

RE: issue: optional parts in <message>?

From: Mike Deem <mikedeem@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:13:59 -0700
Message-ID: <A84507FC48EA7B4B86323F4E82483F7E026D66BB@red-msg-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
See [1] for an example of how this can be done.

  == Mike ==

[1]
http://indigo-sd/docs/bluebook/encapsulation/WSDL-Extension-for-DIME.doc
_generated.htm#wsdl-extension-for-dime__toc7968299


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:01 PM
> To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?
> 
> "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
> >
> > It would be nice if common interoperable representational types were
> > described in a way that could be leveraged across all the XML
> > activities, even those that do not use WSDL. Of course, if there
wasn't
> > a way to define "foreign" types in XML Schema, working groups like
ours
> > would be forced to come with their own "first class" definitions,
but
> > that doesn't seem to be the case any longer.
> 
> I am not a schema expert- could you please show the syntax for how
> I would define a MIME type using XSD? See how it can be done easily
> will help alleviate this aspect of my concerns at least!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 21:14:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT