W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2002

RE: text/wsdl+xml

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:37:31 -0800
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009b01c29bfe$e1f9fb10$d11f11ac@beasys.com>

+1.

I've almost never heard of WSDL being targetted at typical end users.  

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:28 PM
> To: ryman@ca.ibm.com
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: text/wsdl+xml
> 
> 
> 
> FWIW, I just noticed the mention of "text/wsdl+xml".  IMO, I don't
> believe that's necessary.  In the HTML WG, we were originally going to
> use "text/xhtml+xml" instead of "application/xhtml+xml", but decided
> to go with only "application/xhtml+xml" because one of the things that
> the "text" major type indicates is that the content can be understood
> by a typical end user (since text/* falls-back to text/plain, which
> is for human consumption).
> 
> MB
> -- 
> Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
> Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 20:38:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT