- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:37:31 -0800
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1. I've almost never heard of WSDL being targetted at typical end users. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:28 PM > To: ryman@ca.ibm.com > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: text/wsdl+xml > > > > FWIW, I just noticed the mention of "text/wsdl+xml". IMO, I don't > believe that's necessary. In the HTML WG, we were originally going to > use "text/xhtml+xml" instead of "application/xhtml+xml", but decided > to go with only "application/xhtml+xml" because one of the things that > the "text" major type indicates is that the content can be understood > by a typical end user (since text/* falls-back to text/plain, which > is for human consumption). > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 20:38:51 UTC