text/wsdl+xml

FWIW, I just noticed the mention of "text/wsdl+xml".  IMO, I don't
believe that's necessary.  In the HTML WG, we were originally going to
use "text/xhtml+xml" instead of "application/xhtml+xml", but decided
to go with only "application/xhtml+xml" because one of the things that
the "text" major type indicates is that the content can be understood
by a typical end user (since text/* falls-back to text/plain, which
is for human consumption).

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis