W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > December 2002

Re: "Web service" or "web service"

From: Amelia A. Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:28:33 -0500
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-Id: <20021203122833.17193d97.alewis@tibco.com>

I agree.  But I think we're having silly-season debates, dears ....

On 03 Dec 2002 18:22:14 +0100
Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> wrote:

> 
> My voice for "web service" here, although I almost couldn't care less.
> 8-)
> 
> Reason: once it's ubiquitous, it's lowercased anyway. Don't we want web
> services to be ubiquitous? 8-) (Same is happening for email, internet
> etc.)
> 
>                    Jacek Kopecky
> 
>                    Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
>                    http://www.systinet.com/
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 20:47, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > 
> > I have always use "Web service" and not "web service" .. the current
> > draft uses the latter while the first WD used the prior (for the
> > most part, I think).
> > 
> > What does the WG feel? I personally prefer "Web service" as there
> > is only one Web; its *the* Web and not *a* web.
> > 
> > Make your choice known and I'll make it so ..
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> 
> 


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 12:28:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT