- From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:55:17 -0700
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 06:56:22 -0400, in soap you wrote: >>"Simon Fell" <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk> writes: >> >Yes, the references across NSs always have to be QNames. I believe >> >telling whether a name is a QName or an NCName is simple- just see >> >whether there's a colon or not. >> >> but an unprefixed value, is still a valid QName. > >Isn't it a QName with a null namespace URI? Is there a difference >between that and an NCName?? No, its a QName with a null prefix. the namespace URI will depend on whatever the default namespace is at that scope. >> It sounds to me like its just making it more complex, not less. Stick >> with QNames and make it clearer in the prose. > >That would be my own personal preference too! > >Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 20:55:18 UTC