W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Requesting WSDL Files

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:28:22 -0400
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040706192822.GG22429@markbaker.ca>

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 11:41:39AM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> Either it's OK to create URIs on the client, or not.  

It's ok.

> For a client to create a URI, it needs data + metadata on how to create the URI.  By definition, if the client doesn't know the URI construction rules metadata, it can't construct a URI.  Hence Google, or any other site for that matter, can never construct a client side URI without the metadata/algorithm.  

Correct.

> Whether the metadata or URI is sent as a response to a request (your HEAD + InterfaceDescription header response), or as a normative specification asserted by the authority ( it supports ?wsdl), is optimization.

I believe that to be incorrect; REST requires the former, and precludes
the latter.

It is also not optimization, it is architecture; the former has superior
visibility and evolvability properties than the latter, since it's
possible for new relationships between resources to be communicated
without requiring software modifications; something that isn't possible
if the relationship is declared in some separate specification.

Mark.
--
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca

  Seeking work on large scale application/data integration projects
  and/or the enabling infrastructure for same.
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 15:28:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:27 GMT