"Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > > I agree with Sanjiva. I don't see how WS-RF can be considered as > RESTful. I would say that WS-RF builds an object-oriented or > resource-oriented view of the world using angle brackets but I wouldn't > call that REST. But then again... that's just me :-) I didn't go that far. I know your feelings about WS-RF :-) .. WS-RF builds a world where things have WS-Addressing EPRs. That's it. The rest (or the REST ;-)) of it is a figment of your imagination. IMO, of course. Sanjiva.Received on Monday, 5 July 2004 11:30:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:27 GMT