On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Champion, Mike wrote: > Sure, I definitely appreciate Roger's ability to get to the heart of the > matter. But I think I answered you honestly and accurately, buried down in > my farewell speech: The case for basing a services architecture on REST > principles is not the consensus position in the industry, and does not have > enough documented technical evidence in its favor to warrant a radical > overthrow of the consensus. Ok, sounds more or less like a +1 to Roger. Thanks. > The W3C Web Services activity has collectively > thrown a lot of bones to REST, and its now the RESTifarians' job to make > something other than dogfood from them :-) Those aren't our bones, they're *yours*. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Friday, 30 January 2004 13:48:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:25 GMT