+1 I admire Hao's attempt to sneak this in the back door 8-), but I think it would only confuse people. Web services proponents have rejected the uniform interface, and that needs to be clear IMO. Mark. On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:49:53AM -0500, David Booth wrote: > > At 03:25 PM 1/12/2004 +1100, He, Hao wrote: > >. . . > >2. Two main architectural constraints of SOA: 1) A small set of simple and > >ubiquitous interfaces to all participating software agents. > > I think we better NOT say "ubiquitous" here, because that makes it sounds > like Web services offer a "uniform interface" (a la REST). According to > REST folks, one of the problems of WS is that they do NOT obey the uniform > interface requirement. Instead, each WS defines its own interfaces. > > I think we can just drop the word "ubiquitous" and the above would be fine. > > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 11:12:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:25 GMT