RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:04 PM
> To: Champion, Mike
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6

> >
> > Why aren't messages subservient to services?  The messages 
> exist only 
> > for the purpose of invoking the service and telling the 
> consumer the 
> > result, no?
> 
> The fundamental reason that messages must *not* be 
> subservient to services is that more than one service may 
> process a given message. 
> There is no one-to-one relationship between messages and services.

OK, got it. I agree.