W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2004

RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:17:57 -0800
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9032B8A0A@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Well, some of the concepts the grid community deals with are object IDs, object factories, and object attributes that you can get and set. That sounds more object-oriented-ish to me than SOA-ish.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Bijan Parsia
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:03 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 12, 2004, at 6:10 PM, He, Hao wrote:
> 
> > I think grid computing can also benefit significantly if 
> they take a 
> > more
> > SOA approach.
> >
> > My personal observation is that the research community is 
> relatively 
> > slow on
> > adopting new IT concepts for good or bad. I was still doing Fortran
> > programming not long ago.
> 
> Er...the Grid itself is at least somewhat new :) And Fortran both 
> evolved and isn't clearly sensibly replaceable in a lot of contexts.
> 
> How could they be more SOAy? What ways *aren't* they SOAy and at what 
> cost?
> 
> I confess to being a bit vague on Grid details, but they seem 
> eminently 
> SOAish.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan Parsia.
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 January 2004 19:19:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:24 GMT