RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6

Also look at the grid discussion in http://www.sys-con.com/webservices/article.cfm?id=706 .

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:18 PM
> To: Bijan Parsia; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6
> 
> 
> 
> Well, some of the concepts the grid community deals with are 
> object IDs, object factories, and object attributes that you 
> can get and set. That sounds more object-oriented-ish to me 
> than SOA-ish.
> 
> Ugo
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> > Behalf Of Bijan Parsia
> > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:03 PM
> > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Proposed replacement text for Section 1.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jan 12, 2004, at 6:10 PM, He, Hao wrote:
> > 
> > > I think grid computing can also benefit significantly if 
> > they take a 
> > > more
> > > SOA approach.
> > >
> > > My personal observation is that the research community is 
> > relatively 
> > > slow on
> > > adopting new IT concepts for good or bad. I was still 
> doing Fortran
> > > programming not long ago.
> > 
> > Er...the Grid itself is at least somewhat new :) And Fortran both 
> > evolved and isn't clearly sensibly replaceable in a lot of contexts.
> > 
> > How could they be more SOAy? What ways *aren't* they SOAy 
> and at what 
> > cost?
> > 
> > I confess to being a bit vague on Grid details, but they seem 
> > eminently 
> > SOAish.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Bijan Parsia.
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 12 January 2004 19:23:18 UTC