W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2004

RE: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:36:40 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA801CC76A@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>


Mark:

> No, it shouldn't be, that's my point.  All of those systems I 
> mentioned define the abstractions.

And WSA defines its abstractions too. One of them happens to be a
message. Why is this less valid than an inbox?

Jim

Received on Sunday, 8 February 2004 22:38:21 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Webber: "RE: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document"
Previous message: Mark Baker: "Re: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document"
Maybe in reply to: Newcomer, Eric: "RE: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document"
Next in thread: Mark Baker: "Re: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document"
Reply: Mark Baker: "Re: REST wrap-up (was Re: Web Services Architecture Document"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:26 GMT