- From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:00:42 -0500
- To: ''www-ws-arch@w3.org ' ' <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On Feb 6, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > See http://www.1060research.com/ for some people that don't agree. > What would they disagree with? http://www.1060.org/blogxter/entry? publicid=7C88E1D0B72BD62EDED670A9EAA4C14E gives me a rather different impression about their fondness for RESTifarian dogma: " Atom looks at the world with HTTP spectacles. If we're going to do a blog protocol let's do it right. Abstract the messaging from the transport. Work out what you want to exchange, define a transport neutral layer and plug the transports (HTTP, SMS, IM, email, BPP[1]...) into the framework. ..." I don't see anything in the rest of that post that I disagree with. Likewise, http://1060research-server-1.co.uk/docs/latest/docxter/ doc_Net_Kernel_Principles_and_Philosophy.html seems *extremely* consistent with my assertion that XML rather than HTTP is the secret sauce in "services over the Web" [ which is a superset of Web services as WSA defined it]
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 15:01:12 UTC