W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2003

RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web services

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:38:18 -0500
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E026EFCFE@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org

I know that this is a dumb question, but could you explain how the WS-*
specs relate to SAML?  Is the SAML functionality in WS-* somewhere, so
that the specs are incompatible?  Or does WS-* operate in a different
space and interact with SAML somehow?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:16 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: FYI: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web
services



This whitepaper documents the Web services platfrom from IBM/MSFT's
point-of-view:

http://www-3.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/SecureReliableTr
ansa
ctedWSAction.pdf

You may need to join the lines assuming SMTP breaks it up. The paper is
available somewhere on the MSFT site as well.

I personally think its a nice document that explains the role of the key
WS-* specs that IBM/MSFT/others have published in supporting the
business requirements of secure, reliable, transacted interactions. Of
course I'm not exactly unbiased in my view; YMMV.

Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 17:38:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:22 GMT