W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Web Services specs

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:56:58 +0200
Message-ID: <3F82E24A.50105@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Cutler Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org

I meant diagrams. I can also supply drawings for a premium. ;-)

JJ.

Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:

> Hmmm ... Drawings?  As in cartoons?  Or visio diagrams?
> 
> Those seem to me to be the extremes.  What do you have in mind?  I like
> drawings.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:31 AM
> To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)
> Cc: Paul Denning; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Web Services specs
> 
> 
> 
> I think it would be a valuable deliverable of this WG to work on a 
> merged list with (some) explaination for each spec, and some amount of 
> clustering. This would very concretely paint the WS landscape, in 
> addition to your other deliverables.
> 
> If this work was to take off, I might be able to contribute some
> drawings.
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:
> 
> 
>>Wow.  That's a huge list.  It indeed has a bunch of things my 
>>annotated list does not, but I think at least some of that is because 
>>it is drilling down into more detail.  That is, some of these would 
>>probably come under the umbrella of one of my more general entries. 
>>Some others, however, are new to me.  And, I may be wrong, but I think
> 
> 
>>my list has a few not on this one.
>>
>>I am not volunteering to merge this list and mine.  There are too many
> 
> 
>>entries on this one that I don't understand ... And besides it would 
>>take more time and effort than I am willing to put into this at the 
>>moment.
>>
>>It seems to me that the two lists represent, to some extent, different
> 
> 
>>approaches and might serve different purposes.  Which, if either, is 
>>appropriate output for this WG is unclear to me.  Maybe neither -- but
> 
> 
>>quite possibly many of us can individually derive some benefit from 
>>these snapshots anyway.
>>
>>-----Original Message----- From: Paul Denning [mailto:pauld@mitre.org]
> 
> 
>>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:06 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject:
> 
> 
>>Web Services specs
>>
>>
>>
>>Here is a list that may be useful.  Not complete.  Some are not in
>>Roger's annotated list at 
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Oct/0010.html
>>
>>Paul
>>
>>AT&T/BEA/Canon/Microsoft/SAP/ , SOAP Messages with Attachments, 1 Apr
> 
> 
>>2003, 
>>http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/SOAP_Messages_Attachme
>>nt
>> s.jsp BEA, SOAP Conversation Protocol (SOAP Conversation) 1.0, 13
>>Jun 2002, 
>>http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/SOAPConversation.jsp 
>>BEA, WS-CallBack Protocol (WS-CallBack), 26 Feb 2003, 
>>http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/WS-CallBack-0_9.jsp 
>>BEA, Web Service Acknowledgement Protocol (WS-Acknowledgement), 26
>>Feb 2003, 
>>
> 
> http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/WS-Acknowledgement-0_9.j
> 
>> sp BEA, Web Services Message Data (WS-MessageData), 26 Feb 2003, 
>>http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/WS-MessageData-0_9.jsp
>> BEA/IBM/Microsoft, Business Process Execution Language for Web
>>Services,
>>
>>Version 1.0, 31 July 2002,
>>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bpel/ 
>>BEA/IBM/Microsoft, Web Services Addressing , March 2003, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2003/03/ws-addressing/ 
>>BEA/IBM/Microsoft, Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination), 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/08/WSCoor/ BEA/IBM/Microsoft, Web
>>Services Transaction (WS-Transaction), August 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/08/wstx/ BEA/IBM/Microsoft/TIBCO
>>Software, "Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol", March 2003, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2003/03/ws-reliablemessaging/ DARPA,
>>DAML-S (and OWL-S) 0.9 Draft Release, 2003-05, 
>>http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/0.9/ 
>>Fujitsu/Hitachi/Oracle/Sonic/Sun, Web Services Reliability 
>>(WS-Reliability) Ver1.0, 8 Jan 2003,
>>http://www.sonicsoftware.com/wsreliability IBM, Web Services Flow
>>Language (WSFL 1.0), May 2001, 
>>http://www-3.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.pdf 
>>IBM/Microsoft, WS-Attachments, 17 June 2002, 
>>
> 
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-attach.html
> 
>> IBM/Microsoft/BEA/SAP, Web Services Policy Assertions Language 
>>(WS-PolicyAssertions), 18 December 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/PolicyAssertions/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/BEA/SAP, Web Services Policy Attachment 
>>(WS-PolicyAttachment), 18 December 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/PolicyAttachment/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/BEA/SAP, Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 18
>> December 2002, http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/Policy/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/VeriSign, "Web Services Security (WS-Security)", 5
>>April 2002, http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/04/Security/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/VeriSign, "Web Services Security Addendum", Version
>>1.0, 18 August 2002, http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/07/Security/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/VeriSign/RSA Security, Web Services Secure Conversation
>> Language (WS-SecureConversation), Version 1.0, 18 December 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/ws-secure-conversation/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/VeriSign/RSA Security, Web Services Security Policy 
>>Language (WS-SecurityPolicy), Version 1.0, 18 December 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/ws-security-policy/ 
>>IBM/Microsoft/VeriSign/RSA Security, Web Services Trust Language 
>>(WS-Trust), Version 1.0, 18 December 2002, 
>>http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2002/12/ws-trust/ IETF, HTTP Over TLS,
>>RFC 2818, May 2000, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt IETF, Using
>>the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible 
>>Exchange Protocol (BEEP), RFC 3288, 
>>http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3288.txt ISO/IEC, Information
>>Technology - Document Description and Processing Languages, The XML
>>Topic Maps (XTM) Syntax 1.1, JTC 1/SC34 N0398, 2003-04-03,
>>http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/sam-xtm/ OASIS,
>>Collaboration-Protocol Profile and Agreement Specification, Version 
>>2.0, OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and Agreement
>>Technical Committee, 23 September 2002 
>>,http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/204/ebcpp-2.0.pdf 
>>OASIS, Message Service Specification, Version 2.0, OASIS ebXML
>>Messaging
>>
>>Services Technical Committee, 1 April 2002,
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/documents/ebMS_v2_0.pdf
>> OASIS, OASIS/ebXML Registry Information Model v2.0, Approved OASIS 
>>Standard, OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical Committee, April 2002, 
>>http://oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.0/specs/ebrim.pdf
>> OASIS, OASIS/ebXML Registry Services Specification v2.0, Approved
>>OASIS Standard, OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical Committee, April 2002,
>> http://oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.0/specs/ebrs.pdf
>> OASIS, Schema Centric XML Canonicalization, Version 1.0, 10 July
>>2002, http://uddi.org/pubs/SchemaCentricCanonicalization-20020710.htm
>> OASIS, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v1.1, OASIS
>>Standard, 2
>>
>>September 2003,
>>
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3400/oasis-sstc-saml-1
> 
>> .1-pdf-xsd.zip OASIS, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), 5
>>Nov 2002, 
>>
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/1383/oasis-sstc-saml-1
> 
>> .0-pdf.zip OASIS, UDDI Version 3.0 Published Specification, 19 July
>>2002, 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm#uddiv3
>> OASIS, Universal Description, Discovery and Integration V2.0, 19
>>July 2002, 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/tcspecs.shtml#uddiv2 
>>OASIS, Web Services Security, 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/1204/doc-index.html
>> OASIS, Web Services for Remote Portlets Specification, OASIS
>>Standard, August 2003, 
>>
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3343/oasis-200304-wsrp
> 
>> -specification-1.0.pdf OASIS, eXtensible Access Control Markup
>>Language (XACML) Version 1.0, OASIS Standard, 18 February 
>>
> 
> 2003,http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/940/oasis-xacml-1
> 
>> .0.pdf OASIS-UN/CEFACT, ebXML Business Process Specification Schema
>>(BPSS), Version 1.01, 11 May 2001,
>>http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf W3C NOT, Web Services
>>Conversation Language (WSCL) 1.0, 14 March 2002, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-wscl10-20020314/ W3C NOTE, SOAP
>>Messages with Attachments, 11 Dec 2000, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-attachments-20001211 W3C NOTE,
>>SOAP Version 1.2 Message Normalization, 28 March 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-soap12-n11n-20030328/ W3C NOTE, SOAP:
>>Simple Object Access Protocol 1.1, 08 May 2000, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ W3C NOTE, Web Service
>>Choreography Interface (WSCI) 1.0, 8 August 2002, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-wsci-20020808 W3C, OWL Web Ontology
>>Language Guide, W3C Candidate Recommendation 18 August 2003,
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-guide-20030818/ W3C, OWL Web
>>Ontology Language Overview, W3C Candidate Recommendation, 18 August
>>2003, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-features-20030818/ W3C, OWL
>>Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Candidate Recommendation 18 
>>August 2003, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-ref-20030818/ W3C, OWL
>>Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax, W3C Candidate 
>>Recommendation 18 August 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-semantics-20030818/ W3C, OWL Web
>>Ontology Language Test Cases, W3C Candidate Recommendation, 18 August
>>2003, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-owl-test-20030818/ W3C, OWL Web
>>Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements, W3C Candidate
>>
>>Recommendation 18 August 2003,
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-webont-req-20030818/ W3C, SOAP Version
>>1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, W3C Recommendation, 24 June 2003,
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/ W3C, SOAP
>>Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts, W3C Recommendation, 24 June 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/ W3C, Web
>>Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, W3C Node, 15 March 2001, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315 W3C, Web Services
>>Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2 Part 1: Core Language, W3C
>>Working Draft, 11 June 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-20030611 W3C, Web Services
>>Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2 Part 2: Message Patterns, W3C
>>Working Draft, 11 June 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-patterns-20030611 W3C, Web
>>Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 1.2 Part 3: Bindings, 
>>W3C Working Draft, 11 June 2003, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20030611 W3C, XML
>>Encryption Syntax and Processing - W3C Recommendation, 10 December 
>>2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/PR-xmlenc-core-20021003/ W3C, XML Key
>>Management Specification (XKMS) - W3C Note, 30 March 2001, 
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms/ W3C, XML-Signature Syntax and Processing -
>>W3C Recommendation, 12 February 2002,
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/ Web Services Interoperability
>>Organization, Basic Profile Version 1.0a, Final Specification,
>>2003-08-08, 
>>http://ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-08/BasicProfile-1.0a.html Web
>>Services Interoperability Organization, Sample Application Supply 
>>Chain Management Architecture, Version 1.0, 16 April 2003, 
>>
> 
> http://www.ws-i.org/SampleApplications/SupplyChainManagement/2003-04/SCM
> 
>> Architecture1.0-BdAD.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:57:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:23 GMT