W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2003

RE: "Marchitecture" text for stack diagram

From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:06:39 -0400
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <NFBBLCDGGLCHCHFEJFIGOENICLAA.katia@cs.cmu.edu>

+1 to Mike's wording
"this area [the Process box] is much less clearly
defined than other parts of the WSA."
  --Katia
-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Champion, Mike
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:49 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: "Marchitecture" text for stack diagram





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:anne@manes.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 10:25 AM
> To: Mike Champion; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: "Marchitecture" text for stack diagram
>

>
> "and UDDI serves as a discovery service for the WSDL descriptions"

Much better, thanks.

>
> Also, I'd say that "the process of discovering service
> descriptions that
> meet specified criteria" is fairly mature -- UDDI V2 is an

Well, I agree that "mature" is not the right word here.  On the other hand,
I don't think we as a group give UDDI nearly as much weight as a fundamental
component of WSA as we do SOAP and WSDL, and wish to make sure that WS
descriptions on the Web that can be discovered with a search engine or WSDL
documents in an XML repository are also covered by the WSA.  So, perhaps a
better way to put it is "this area [the Process box] is much less clearly
defined than other parts of the WSA."
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 11:06:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT