W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Questions prompted by the publication of WS-ReliableMessaging

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:46:23 -0800
To: "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <037d01c2eb33$f11f6060$6418e8d8@beasys.com>
I suggest you need to read the specs slower rather than quicker :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ugo Corda
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:44 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Questions prompted by the publication of WS-ReliableMessaging

Probably most people in the group have had a chance by now to see this
week's announcement of the publication of WS-ReliableMessaging (see [1]).

After a quick reading of the spec, I have to say that I don't see any major
architectural/technical differences compared to the OASIS
WS-ReliableMessaging TC activity and its input document WS-Reliability (or
at least differences big enough to justify going a completely separate way).

I really hope that some WSA members whose companies published the new
reliability spec can help me clarify the previous point and provide some
architectural/technical rationale for the separate publication.

Thank you, 

P.S. No need to answer if the rationale for publication is a political one
(I can figure that out by myself ...). 

[1] http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2003-03-13-a.html

Received on Saturday, 15 March 2003 15:50:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:05 UTC