W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2003

Re: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:06:00 -0500
To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030305220600.F19647@www.markbaker.ca>

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:26:38AM -0600, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:
> This looks to me like a good definition within the context of looking at
> architecture, but in the context of RM it doesn't look entirely
> appropriate to me.  In the same sense that some of the definitions of
> synchronous floating around look perfectly fine to me, but not
> appropriate for our particular context.

Agreed.  I just thought that these definitions may be glossary-bound,
and if that's the case I think that either a more general definition of
reliability is required, or alternately I suppose, that "reliable" is
qualified as applying to reliable messaging only.

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:16:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:05 UTC