Re: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: Visibility ...)

My apologies to the group for responding to Eric's bait on-list.

MB

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:26:39PM -0700, Champion, Mike wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > You said it yourself, Web services are not the Web.  But the Semantic
> > Web is the Web.  Like it or not, the W3C's job is to "Lead the Web to
> > its full potential".  I think it's pretty obvious what that means.
> 
> I very strongly believe that www-ws@w3.org is the appropriate home for this
> and similar topics and would appreciate it being moved there or somewhere
> else.   This list is where the WSA WG does its technical work.  I assure all
> concerned that the work is subject to careful scrutiny by the W3C team and
> management to ensure that we operate within the framework of the charter
> approved by the W3C Advisory Committee.  
> 
> I expect that we will be cutting off tangential discussions here in much the
> same way as the TAG has been forced to do on their public list, in order to
> maintain a reasonable traffic volume and focus.  Critique of WG draft
> documents is welcomed, specific, realistic suggestions for improvement are
> especially welcome.  
> 
> I confess that I have been too willing to chase trout down rabbit holes
> myself (to mix our favorite metaphors!) but will resolve to avoid the
> temptation in the future.  Appropriate slaps with a large trout are
> appropriate if I backslide! 

-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

Received on Sunday, 2 March 2003 23:29:47 UTC