W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: Visibility ...)

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 22:06:20 -0600
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E01624B1C@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

Agree totally with Mike's statement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:27 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Appropriate topics for www-ws-arch (was RE: Visibility ...)

> You said it yourself, Web services are not the Web.  But the Semantic 
> Web is the Web.  Like it or not, the W3C's job is to "Lead the Web to 
> its full potential".  I think it's pretty obvious what that means.

I very strongly believe that www-ws@w3.org is the appropriate home for
this and similar topics and would appreciate it being moved there or
else.   This list is where the WSA WG does its technical work.  I assure
concerned that the work is subject to careful scrutiny by the W3C team
and management to ensure that we operate within the framework of the
charter approved by the W3C Advisory Committee.  

I expect that we will be cutting off tangential discussions here in much
the same way as the TAG has been forced to do on their public list, in
order to maintain a reasonable traffic volume and focus.  Critique of WG
draft documents is welcomed, specific, realistic suggestions for
improvement are especially welcome.  

I confess that I have been too willing to chase trout down rabbit holes
myself (to mix our favorite metaphors!) but will resolve to avoid the
temptation in the future.  Appropriate slaps with a large trout are
appropriate if I backslide! 
Received on Sunday, 2 March 2003 23:06:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:05 UTC