W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2003

RE: FW: Proposed draft text for 2.2.21

From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:08:00 +1000
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB046AE5D8@sydthqems01.int.tisa.com.au>
To: "'Mark Baker'" <mbaker@iam-net.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Yes, you would have content in two places.  I don't see anything wrong with
this since we allow external data to be part of a message anyway.  

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:mbaker@iam-net.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:32 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: Proposed draft text for 2.2.21



On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:55:29PM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote:
> A message can be as simple as an HTTP GET request, in which the HTTP
headers
> are the headers and the parameters encoded in the URL are the content.

I was expecting that "content" would refer to the body, no?  Otherwise,
on a POST, since there's a URI and a body, you'd have the content in two
places.

So I'd suggest that the last part be rewritten as "and there is no
content", or alternately, just snipped.

Thanks.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca


Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 01:06:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:21 GMT