W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2003

RE: The UR Trout: Web Services, REST, SOAP

From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:33:25 -0700
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PEEBJKKCFNCENDPJDEMIGEICDGAA.martin.chapman@oracle.com>

yes but are they [http and xml] "web services"? this is the 1m euro
question.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:59 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: The UR Trout: Web Services, REST, SOAP
>
>
>
> "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> writes:
> > -1, I suppose.  I really like the idea of a bite sized chunk describing
> > the raison d'etre of Web services (when compared to the Web),
> but I'd say
> > that this text raises more questions than it answers.
>
> Such as? (Not sure whether I want to hear the answer but what the heck.)
>
> FWIW I thought the paragraph was a nice comprising, sensitive description
> which actually makes complete technical sense .. if you don't need the
> complexity and power of SOAP & WSDL, just do HTTP & XML.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:32:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:21 GMT